Whistle Blower Essay - Drug Dogs

In: Other Topics

Submitted By rougebiscuit
Words 477
Pages 2
Hunter Viles™
Mrs. Lesky
Eng III 6th hour
19 September 2012
Whistle Blower Drugs are around. No matter where you go. It’s a fact of life. Many people try not to believe it, but it’s true. Cops do their job to make sure these “drugies” and “druge dealers” get caught and justice is served, right? Well, for the most part, they do. However, there is a right way and there is a crooked way to do things. Cops in Charlevoix have been proved to misuse drug dogs. Who knows who else have been using drug dogs to their advantage. They’re animals that can easily be trained and controlled by humans. Drug dogs should not be used because they aren’t always accurate, they cost too much, and some cops don’t use them in the correct way. “Send the K9 unit!” Sounds pretty promising if a cop yells that, but not as much as you may think. Drug dogs have been known to be easily thrown off. Bacon, beef, and common dog treats have been known to throw off the scent of a professionally trained drug dog. If a drug dealer knows this simple trick, an easy getaway could be in his future. Something that is so easily thrown off should not be dependable. A nose of a dog shouldn’t be the last resort to try to find something or someone. For one of the best drug dogs you can possible get, the lowest price is $5,000, not including shipping. Most K9 units come from Germany which can ride shipping costs up to $3,000 a dog. This reason goes hand and hand with the first reason previously stated. If we pay up to $8,000 for an unreliable resource, what’s with wasting our money? Though the dogs are already professionally trained, they still are unreliable and are not worth the money. Two Charlevoix cops were fired last year after being found guilty for misusing drug dogs. The cops would throw treats next to suspicious looking cars to make the dogs sit down, the common sign for a dog to show if it…...

Similar Documents

Whistle Blower Rewarded by Fbi

...hundreds of millions of dollars (FBI, 2010). This agreement, made in December 2004, remains the largest fraud settlement in Missouri history and, at the time, was the sixth largest in the country (FBI, 2010). This lawsuit remains the largest settlement in Missouri history (Savat, 2011). Under the federal whistle-blower law, Dr. Bander received a $56 million share of the settlement (FBI, 2010). With his settlement amount, Bander started up a new foundation for Medical Ethics. He wanted his students and any person in the medical field to be informing of what is right and what is wrong. This is what ethics teaches us. His foundation became known as the Bander business Ethics in Medical Research (FBI, 2010). He also opened up another foundation called “Bander Business Ethics in Medical Research Funding Program. (Vitale, Missouri Lawyers Media, 2011).” The mission of the Bander Center for Medical Business Ethics is to promote ethical business practices in medical care and research through the development of training and investigation opportunities for medical students, residents and physicians in practice (FBI, 2010). Dr. Bander was classified as a whistle-blower. Whistle-blowers are protected very well. These people are those inside the company that report unethical behavior (Ferrell, Fraedrich, & Ferrell, 2011, p. 110). Bander did report the wrong doing of his company, and by doing so, he protected consumers from further fraud. Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and......

Words: 1309 - Pages: 6

Problem and Solution: Drug Abuse Essay

...A drug is any chemical substance which when taken into the body was psychological and physioligical effects. Generally drugs are prescribed for medical purposes to alleviate pain or to cure illness. However here are some substances which when introduced into the body also cause psychological and physiological effects that are not curative. Indiscrimanate use of drugs with no regard to their side effects is called drug abuse, commonly abused drugs include khat, nicotine, bhang and alcohol. Prolonged abuse of drugs can cause addiction. Drug abuse is rife in many countries. Billions of dollars are spent internationally preventing drug use, treating addicts, and fighting drug-related crime. Although drugs threaten many societies, their effects can also be combated successfully.This essay looks at some of the effects of drug use on society, and suggests some solutions to the problem. Drug abuse causes multiple problems for countries and communities.The medical and psychological effects are very obvious.Addicts cannot function as normal members of society. They neglect or abuse their families, and eventually require expensive treatment or hospitalization. The second effect is on crime.Huge police resources are needed to fight smuggling and dealing. Criminal gangs and mafia underworlds develop with the money from drugs. However, the menace of drugs can be fought.Education is the first battle.Children need to be told at home and in school about drugs. People need to be aware of......

Words: 348 - Pages: 2

War on Drugs Informative Essay

...-070 The War on Drugs The “War on Drugs” is a term commonly applied to a campaign of prohibition, military aid and military intervention, with the intention of reducing and eliminating the illegal drug trade. The War on Drugs was officially declared in 1971 by President Richard Nixon and is still very prominent in our society today. The War on Drugs has been studied since its inception and copious amounts of data have been collected from it. The War on Drugs has a long history; since it has been enacted the government has utilized large sums of money funding it, made illicit drug use rise in percentage overall, and created an artificial and thriving black market. There is an ongoing debate on whether the War on Drugs is effective and organizations like the DPA (Drug Policy Alliance) are fighting to change it. However, the Obama administration is continuing the War on Drugs and has changed the name to the “National Drug Control Policy.” The first U.S law that restricted the distribution and use of certain drugs was the “Harrison Narcotics Tax Act” of 1914. This act regulated and taxed the production, importation, and distribution of opiates and Cocaine products. This Act pushed a more restrictive handling of certain drugs that would inevitably lead to the creation of more drug policies and the current drug war. On June 18th 1971, ongoing policies, laws, and counter culture built up and President Richard Nixon declared a “War on Drugs” stating that the drug problem in the......

Words: 2694 - Pages: 11

Whistle Blower

...Being a Whistle Blower To some the word whistleblower just sounds like a bad thing to be called. So what is a whistle blower you may ask? A whistleblower is a person who informs on a person or an organization engaged in an illicit activity. So what are the pro to being a whistleblower, better yet what are the cons as well? Some of the pros are that the person who is a whistleblower is a courageous individual who recognize a wrong and are willing to take risks in order to see that the wrongs are corrected. “Personal gratification isn’t the only benefit of becoming a whistleblower though. The amount that the relator can receive most often ranges from 15% to 30% depending on whether the government intervenes in the case or not. The whistle blower will also receive 10 to 30 percent of the monies the SEC and other government authorities collect based on the whistleblower’s information if more than $1 million is collected.” (Pros and Cons of Becoming a Whistleblower) This is what most people that are whistleblowers go for. Most people don’t care about what is the right thing to do in a case but instead what the pay out may be at the end of the tunnel. The people like this are the people that don’t deserve to have a job and need to just become hermits because no one wants any one like that working for them or around them. Lets talk cons now. “Filing a qui tam or whistleblower suit is not for the light-hearted. In addition to the stress and anxiety associated with reporting a......

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Study Drugs Essay

...Study drugs This essay is about study drugs I will include analyses of how David Sack criticized study drugs in the article “Do Study drugs Breed Nation of Winners or Cheaters?” In the analyses, I will write about which type of text it is, writer, language and intention. I will discuss different views about using drugs in USA. I will comment on a radio broadcast “More students turning illegally to “smart” drugs” The article “Do study drugs Breed Nation of winners or cheaters” written by David Sack, is a critical article. The structure in the sentence is complicated. There is used paratactic sentences. The vocabulary is rich, formal, neutral and academic. It is concrete and many “expert words” are used. The author tries to make the language more colloquial, so “normal people” also can understand it. The adjectives is not use in a descriptive way. The author focus on the schools, where the drugs is used. He refers to the use of drugs that, you should not take them. He refers to studies that shows kind of things according to study drugs, and to people who is studying the use of drugs. The author David Sack is using many arguments an example of a lining (page 1 line 20-21) “Not surprisingly, young people are less likely to view study drugs as cheating than steroid use in sports” he is trying to give a message about why people are using drugs. Maybe it´s not cheating to use drugs to study, but people, who takes them, because of their sport, so they can do better, are cheating...

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blower

...Is it worth blowing the whistle? Ethics, values and beliefs all play a role in accounting. But when it comes being a whistleblower you can see where these things can start to conflict with one another. Even though there are laws to protect a whistle blower very few people do and those who do blow the whistle aren’t always happy after it’s done. At the same time those who do report do receive benefits and can say they truly have honesty and integrity. Ethics is more than just what’s right and wrong. What is right to one person can be considered wrong to another. Ethics are based off of what we know to be morally right or wrong. Smoking marijuana is wrong in the United States but considered ordinary or right in Amsterdam. Some ethical decisions go further than knowing what is the right thing to do, sometimes our emotions can get the best of us and leave us making poor decisions. When deciding the ethical thing to do in a situation you must set your emotions aside and base your decision on what you know or consider being right. Ethics is a large part of accounting. You are constantly faced with decisions where you need to decide the ethical thing to do. Whistleblowing involves the act of reporting wrongdoing within an organization to internal or external parties (Eaton & Akers, 2007).As a whistleblower your ethical decisions are what decide if you should blow the whistle. You know that adjusting numbers such as Enron did is wrong and unethical. Many people are......

Words: 1929 - Pages: 8

Whistle Blower

...Introduction Whistle blowing is a term used to describe a person who reports a wrongdoing to a superior or an authority figure in order to stop the offense. At first thought whistle blowing may seem like an easy decision, but it can easily materialize into a difficult ethical dilemma. In a healthcare environment nurses are expected to put the welfare of there patients first, but what if the consequence of blowing the whistle is committing career suicide? Nurses need to know about this ethical dilemma so when a situation, such as the aforementioned, arises they will know what to do and hopefully make the right decision. This topic really appealed to me because I believe that it is an issue that all nurses will be faced with one day. Additionally it goes against everything I was taught growing up, I was raised to never “taddle tell” or as I got older to never “snitch”. As I now pursue a career in nursing theses rules no longer apply, and the safety and welfare of my patients must come first. Review of Literature One study conducted by Professor Firth-Cozens (2003) asked over 1,700 nurses and doctors “would you blow the whistle on a colleague?” Professor Firth-Collins and his team also explored the factors that go along with whistle blowing; these factors included the fear of retribution, the uncertainty of judging another’s competence and the desire to support other colleagues (“Would you”, 2003). The results were interesting as differences between doctors and nurses......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Let Them Eat Dog Essay

...States, animals such as dogs are treated far better than other animals. The question then arises, why do dogs get treated more diligently while other animals with the same mental capacity get slaughtered and consumed? By looking at "Let Them Eat Dog" by Jonathon Foer, the perception of why one should not think of dogs as superior animals and why the idea of consuming a dog should not be looked down upon in society will be thoroughly analyzed and examined. People in the United States think it’s morally wrong to eat dogs since it is a household pet. The same people who don’t eat dogs, eat other animals such as pigs, chickens, and cows, which is questionable because they still devour animals that are necessary to the environment and society today. In "Let Them Eat Dog" by Jonathon Foer, the author gives logical reasons on why we should eat dog, and why it is not harmful to the society in any manner. It's legal in 44 states to eat dog, and dog meat poses no greater health risk than any other meat. The problem arises is that a dog is labeled as a "man's best friend". Therefore, it is merely wrong to even think of eating a dog in the United States. Because pets such as dogs and cats are considered to be valuable in an average American Household, statistics show that 3 to 4 million dogs and cats get put down every year. Furthermore, the brutal killing of cows and pigs in slaughter houses would decrease as well if it wasn't looked down upon to eat dogs.   Eating dogs would be......

Words: 1015 - Pages: 5

Whistle Blower Policy

...DLF | Whistle Blower Policy | | | [Type the author name] | | | Corporate Governance: Whistle Blower Policy | | 1. Introduction This policy seeks to define and establish the position of DLF Limited and its subsidiaries ('hereinafter referred to as the 'Company') on the framework for reporting instances of unethical/improper conduct and actioning suitable steps to investigate and correct the same. Accordingly, this policy details the following: * Procedure to disclose any suspected unethical and/or improper practice taking place in the Company; * Protection available to the person making such disclosure in good faith; * Mechanism for actioning and reporting on such disclosures to the relevant authority within the Company; and * Relevant authority and its powers to review disclosures and direct corrective action relating to such disclosures. 2. Objective The Company seeks to maintain the highest ethical and business standards in the course of conduct of its business. In doing so, the Company has articulated and published its Code of Conduct, which is applicable to all employees of the Company, to regulate and build a strong culture of corporate governance, by promoting transparency and ethical conduct in its business operations, along with providing the framework within which the Company expects its business operations to be carried out. The Whistleblower policy is an extension of the Company's Code of Conduct through which......

Words: 2107 - Pages: 9

Whistle Blower

...Jairo Magdaleno 3/10/2014 ENG-101-B New Aged Paul Reveres The term whistle blower defines a person who exposes misconduct, alleged dishonesty or illegal activity within an organization. In plain English, this means, someone exposing an organization of wrong doing. However, should a person who exposes wrong doing be punished? Or should they be praised and thanked? Two most recent, possibly the biggest, whistle blowing events include two individuals with high rank within the US government. The question was, should these individuals be punished for their actions? Being portrayed and explained by the mainstream media most people would say "Yes, lock him up!". With a little research, however, one might not find it necessary to punish these individuals so severely. One might even find this move, patriotic. Bradley Manning is an individual convicted of Espionage and sentenced to thirty-five years in federal prison for the largest disclosure of secret government documents. Manning was a Computer Intelligence Analyst with the United States Army. From the seat of his computer work station in Iraq, Manning had access to SIPRNET(The Secret Internet Protocol Router Network). This is the private computer network that the government uses to transmit government files around the world. With a few key strokes, Manning had access to countless "secret" government files. When these files became too much to bare, Manning felt that the public needed to know the truth in......

Words: 491 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blowers

...evaluates the investments by analyzing cash flows. Internal Rate of Return uses percentage that is similar to the rate of interest in comparing potential investments with other possible or existing kind of investments. The method involves dividing the expected profits from the potential investment by the expected expenditure in order to arrive at the rate of return. Evaluating capital investments is an essential task for Johnson Controls Inc. in order to understand the viability of its capital budget before venturing into the emerging markets. Evaluating investments helps the company determine if the investments in question are worthwhile. Johnson Controls Inc. may have many investment opportunities in the emerging market but it must measures the potential of each opportunity preferably in isolation and make comparison of each in order to select the a few or just one that maximizes the value of the firm and reduce the potential risk. For example, Johnson Controls Inc. might be trying to determine if venturing into the emerging market will require buying new equipment or using the existing ones. The company might also be interested in determining if there is need to invest in research and development before venturing into the emerging market with a new or existing product. The company can therefore supplement its traditional methods of evaluating investments (such as payback period) with Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) as well as Multiple......

Words: 1616 - Pages: 7

Essay on Drugs

...“Drugs" The United States is at war. I am not talking about the war in Iraq or the War on Terrorism; I am talking about the War on Drugs. We are currently facing a large debate on the issue of drugs. That is whether drugs should remain illegal or be legalized within the United States. It has come to be a war; a war which is being fought against our own citizens and against other countries. It is a war which has taken many lives and will not cease in its toll. Both sides of the argument have strong points. In 1970, Gore Vidal wrote an essay supporting the legalization of all illegal drugs in the United States. I agree with Vidal, in legalizing drugs. They should be legalized and regulated by the government just as cigarettes are. In “Drugs,” Gore Vidal argues that all drugs should be legalized. The government should make all drugs available in markets and sell that at cost to the consumers. He states that the prohibition of these drugs is a violation of the constitutional right for the pursuit of happiness. He observes that legalizing drugs will take away its title of being a "forbidden fruit." People always want what they cannot have. Legalizing drugs enable people easier access to them, taking away the thrill of getting them. He argues that the prohibition of drugs, like that of alcohol in the 1920's, will be a failure. He believes that both the Bureau of Narcotics and Mafia are against legalizing drugs and selling them at cost because then there......

Words: 847 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blowers: Saints or Sinners

...Unit Three: Case Incident 2: Whistle Blowers: Saints or Sinners Rachel Hogan Kaplan University MT302 Organizational Behavior May 17th, 2011 Corporate whistle-blowing, reporting company wrong-doings is a controversial subject of debate. There have been several widely known cases in which reputations are damaged, sometimes unsubstantiated or falsely, and where informants have received hefty pay-offs. The adoption of the whistle blower law pays informants thirty percent of legal fines received from lawsuits in whistle blowing cases (Judge & Robbins). I believe corporate whistle-blowing is good for organizations, its members, and the general public. It is important for corporate wrong-doings and do-ers to be brought to the attention of senior management. The sooner the wrong-doings are reported and investigated, the better for everyone involved. Before the issue is handled publicly or in court, the organization should have the opportunity to rectify the wrong-doings, which would save money in legal proceedings, and save the reputation of the company. According to our Organizational Behavior textbook, self-fulfilling prophecy has “evolved to characterize the fact that an individual’s behavior is determined by other people’s expectation” (Robbins & Judge, 2007). With this in mind, I believe self-fulfilling prophecy can drive an individual’s search for incriminating evidence or sometimes hinder it. An employee may have a negative......

Words: 847 - Pages: 4

Whistle Blowers : Saints or Sinners Whistle Blowing

...Case Study 1 I believe both whistle blowers and David Stetler thoughts are possible with today’s society and the different opinions of how people interpret situations. If a co-worker has studied the Attribution Theory in which determines whether a persons intentions are internally or externally caused. Self prophecy whistle blower who honestly believes in justice being served would be eager to collect evidence and make sure all evidence is full proof. By frivolous lawsuits occurring whistle blowers who has valid claims would have to make sure: Their story is legit with NO wholes in it for companies to redeem themselves by being able to accuse “one” of lying upon the company. I feel as long as the story is solid and all evidence is there why would “one” not come forth with the information against the company. Whistle blowers claims will be carefully and thoroughly evaluated to make sure everything being presented are facts toward the company To prevent frivolous lawsuits companies and governments should have their own private investigator to do research with personal documentation instead of relying upon the whistle blowers information along. Companies and governments then would be able to catch when or even before fraudulent activities begin. Employees should do what they feel is right for their situation at hand. The disadvantage...

Words: 340 - Pages: 2

Whistle Blowers

...West University 1. Do you believe that whistle-blowing is good for organizations and its members, or is it, as David Stetler believes, often a means to extort financial gains from companies? Whistle blowing means calling attention to wrongdoing that is occurring within an organization. The fact whistle blowers are good/bad for an organization depends on different situations whether a whistle-blowing will have a positive or negative result over the organization. That is it depends on what they're whistling about. If it has intention to get someone trouble then we have to think about the undesirable consequences it might happen for whistle blowing. On the other sense, if it is someone who is angry with the organization for other reasons and blows the whistle solely to cause harm or embarrassment to the company, then they're just a jerk. On the other hand, of it is related to protest against unethical deeds then it is ok. If whistle blowing is a means toward a positive end, then in the long run, we might want to consider it good for the organization as a whole, but not so for some of those within the organization who refuse to adhere to ethical behavior. However, I tend to believe that most whistle blowers are simply conscientious people who see injustice and want it to be corrected. For example, if your company has a procedure that is not being followed, but it really isn't hurting anything, blowing the whistle only causes problems. However, if you know...

Words: 3621 - Pages: 15