Irenean Theodicy

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By icecold000007
Words 390
Pages 2
Solving the Problem: Irenaean Theodicy
Philosophy
* Irenaean theodicy is often referred to as ‘soul-making’ as it is concerned with the development of human souls. * Like Augustine, Irenaeus argued that evil is the consequence of human free will and disobedience. * However, unlike Augustine, Irenaeus believed that God was partly responsible for evil and suffering. * Irenaeus argued that God created the world imperfectly so that imperfect immature beings could develop through a soul-making process into a ‘child of God,’ in his perfect likeness.

* For Irenaeus, God could not have created humans in his perfect likeness of himself because attaining the likeness of God requires the willing co-operation of humans. * God thus had to give humans free will in order for them to be able to willingly co-operate. * Since freedom requires the ability to choose good over evil, God had to permit evil and suffering to occur

* Irenaeus concluded that eventually evil and suffering will be overcome and humans will develop into a perfect likeness of God, and everyone will have eternal life in heaven.

Hicks reformation of the Irenaean Theodicy * John Hick highlighted the importance of God allowing humans to develop themselves * He reasoned that if God made us perfect, then we would have the goodness of robot, which would love God automatically without any further deliberation. * God wants humans to be genuinely loving and therefore gives them free will.

* If God interfered of became too close, humans would be unable to make a free choice and thus would not benefit from the developmental process. * This is known as the counterfactual hypothesis (view that God can continually make everything good) * Therefore, God created humans at an epistemic distance from himself, a distance of knowledge.

Is this the best possible world? * Irenaeus saw…...

Similar Documents

Hamartiology: the Problem of Evil (Theodicy)

...Short Essay #1 Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) The problem with evil is that it is hard to believe that in a world created by a God that is supposed to be an all loving all power full God then why would he allow evil to be in the world. Why would he allow for killings and cancer and natural disasters? Evil is a byproduct of free will, because we are free to choose between doing the right thing, that equates to good, and doing the wrong thing, equating to evil. If God didn't give us our own free will to choose right and wrong we would be like robots being controlled and told what to do. God then did give a gift that was good we as humans misused it and therefore have to suffer the consciences of the evil in this world. Now there are two types of evil in this world moral and natural. These two evils are distinct but not separate.[1] Natural sin the result of moral sin. For example, we are told to obey our mother and father and not pay in the road, but if we disobey and play in the road we are committing moral sin. Now by playing in the road you get hit by a car and become paralyzed that is natural evil. The reason you are paralyzed is because of your moral sin of disobeying. There are a couple of ways you can look at why there is evil in the world, one being the theodicy of Gottfried Leibniz. Leibniz believes that God is obligated to create the best.[2] I believe this to be a true statement for God did create the best when he created humans in his image......

Words: 690 - Pages: 3

Mikul

...leave us hopeless and abandoned when sin entered the world. Romans 3:23 states that we are all sinners, but God offers us a way of escape through Jesus’ sacrifice. There are numerous theodicies that attempt to reconcile the fact that evil and an omnipotent and benevolent God can both exist. Leibniz’s theodicy claims that God made the best possible world, one with good and evil. Critics such as Voltaire reject this because there is so much needless suffering in the world, and there is always a better possible world. The free will theodicy claims that humans, not God, brought evil into the world by abusing free will. Critics argue that all should not be punished for the sins of one. The soul-building theodicy presented by John Hicks states that evil exists for “building moral and spiritual character” (Feinberg, 1186). Evil does serve to strengthen the soul when one fully relies on God. However, this view claims all go to heaven, which would result in sin going unpunished and morality being pointless. While all may not accept these theodicies, they are clearly internally consistent. Whether right or wrong, these theodicies posses no contradictions that would render them obsolete. A theodicy that is inconsistent is self-defeating, illogical, and easily disproven. I agree with the free will theodicy and my view is internally consistent. I believe that God did not create evil; evil is a result of man’s choice to sin. We are given free will because it is “the highest order”......

Words: 821 - Pages: 4

The Daimler Chrysler Merger

...statement that God exists. Some philosophers believe that the evils we find in the world create an evidential problem for theists because theism fails to explain these evils (or most of what we know about them). (See, for example, (Hare 1968).) This position is attractive. It seems to reflect NOUS 23 (1989) 331-350 ? 1989 by Nouis Publications 331 332 NOUS the intuitions of a great many people who have regarded evil as an epistemic problem for theists. After all, the most common way of stating the problem of evil is to ask a why-question like "if God exists, then why is there so much evil in the world?" And such questions are either genuine or rhetorical requests for explanation. Moreover, the relevance of theodicies to this alleged problem of evil is quite clear, since a theodicy can very naturally be understood as an attempt to explain certain evils or facts about evil in terms of theism. But other philosophers who agree that theism fails to explain most of the evils we find in the world deny that this creates an epistemic problem for theists-that is, they deny that this explanatory failure is a prinz facie good reason to reject theism. This disagreement has led to a debate over how much evil, if any, theism needs to explain to avoid disconfirmation. (See, for example, (Yandell 1969a and 1969b), (Kane 1970), (Mavrodes 1970, pp. 90-111), (Ahern 1971), (Hare 1972), and (Yandell 1972).) What the members of both sides of this debate have failed to recognize is that one......

Words: 9076 - Pages: 37

What Is Meant by the Problem of Suffering for Religious Believers?

... However, Aquinas’ argument is based upon the two assumptions that God is infinitely good, and that God’s goodness is the same as human goodness. Many argue that God’s goodness and reasoning is beyond what is known to us and differs from our goodness. This has led to various attempts to resolve the problem of evil and suffering. Whilst the Process theodicy disregards the notion of an omnipotent deity and tries to solve the problem in this way, Monism looks at evil as something that is not real, but merely an illusion from a human perspective. Both of the classical theodicies that are commonly discussed rely on the free-will defense and tend to derive from the idea of evil being a result of human free will. Augustine’s theodicy puts forward that God is good and created a perfect world. A key aspect of the explanation is that it refers to evil as something that is not matter or a substance, but a ‘privation of good’. The theodicy uses the analogy of blindness and how that is a lack of the ability to see, to demonstrate the way in which something may not be an entity in itself but is known due to a lack of something. The theodicy also considers the origin of evil to be due to the abuse of free will – referring to Genesis, it suggests that evil originated as Adam and Eve were tempted by Satan and succeeded in defying God. This also provides an explanation for natural evil, as this first sin is described to have cause a loss of order within nature. Supposedly, after this......

Words: 1478 - Pages: 6

Literary Analysis on the Book of Job

...Bible, The Book of Job details a conflict between man and God within a poetic structure, and is the only book in the Bible to take on the problem of suffering as its main purpose. Throughout the book, Job pleads to God for all of the misfortunes that have befallen him. This type of discourse found in Job cannot be found anywhere else in scripture. Upon examination of the roles of protagonist and antagonist, it becomes apparent that the roles may be alternated between Job and Satan. Moreover, different conclusions and interpretations of the book can be made. Theological complications due to the existence of evil in a world ruled by an omnipotent, omniscient, and benevolent god will be attempted to be reconciled by theodicy. As coined by Gottfried Leibniz, theodicy is a branch of apologetics which attempts to reconcile the apparent evil in the world with God’s benevolent nature. Job’s nature and wealth is described in the first three verses of the book. He is depicted as “perfect and upright, and one that feared God, and eschewed evil” (Job 1:1). It would seem unlikely that Job would ever find himself on the negative side of God, but this seems to be exactly what has happened. In the dialogue between God and Satan (Job 1:7-12), a contest is put forth to test Job’s devotion to God. Satan argues that Job will turn from God if all of his wealth is taken from him. God’s role throughout the narrative is one of an overseer or mediator. God sets the stage and all of the......

Words: 3072 - Pages: 13

Tratkakis, Nick “Replies on the Alleged Failure of Free Will Theodicies: a Reply to Tierno” Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Spohia, Vol. 42, No. 2, October 2003

...JOURNAL ARTICLE CRITIQUE of Tratkakis, Nick “Replies On The Alleged Failure of Free Will Theodicies: A Reply to Tierno” Department of Philosophy, Monash University, Spohia, Vol. 42, No. 2, October 2003 Theo 525 LUO (fall 2013) Systematic Theology I Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary Jeremy W. Allexon (ID# 25923739) September 22, 2013 Introduction The purpose of this piece is to conduct an analysis and re-butt Joel Tierno’s argument “that free will only accounts for choices that issue in evil” But fail to account for evil choices. 1 (Trakakis) The paper begins by breaking down Tierno’s argument in logical fashion A+B=C. As he is breaking down the argument Mr. Trakakis ask a series of questions and does not outright disagree with Tierno but provides another prospective. Brief Summary According to free will theodicists the existence of moral evil is permitted by God so as to preserve human free will, without which a host of significant goods would be unattainable.2 Joel Thomas Tierno ask if such ideas satisfactorily explain and justify God's approval of moral evil 3 & 4 Tierno according to Trakakis fails to understand free will theodicists. 5 Which he goes on to describe well probing Tierno’s argument. Trakakis partitions the piece into sections “Tierno’s ‘Adequacy Argument’ Against Free Will Theodicies” “The Inadequacy of Tierno’s ‘Adequacy Argument’, and ‘The Intelligibility Question’ 6 Critical Interaction Mr. Trakakis talking about two......

Words: 672 - Pages: 3

Theo 202 Essay on Hamartiology: the Problem of Evil (Theodicy)

...Name: Lauren Abbe Writing Style Used: MLA Course and Section Number: THEO 202: B16 Essay on Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) Evil is something that has existed since the beginning of time and is hard to understand its depths because we are so immune to it. God gave us free will and the power to choose, but we continue to choose sin. This paper will seek to explain why there is sin and what the real root of it is. It will help explain why bad things happen and how it might affect one’s relationship with God. The problem of evil happened when Eve believed Satan and ate the fruit from the tree. God does not cause evil and never will. This problem has caused many people to think that our God would want us to suffer and go through pain, but that in fact is not the case. God hates to see us in these types of states, but there is nothing He can do when we choose it for ourselves. We are a selfish and independent world that thinks we can survive and live a blessed life without God or the help of someone greater than ourselves. Without God and without listening to the Holy Spirit, there is no way the problem of evil will get any better; yet it will continue to decline. There are two different types of evil: moral and natural. Natural evil is the consequence of moral evil. Moral evil would be something deliberate such as stealing or murder. Because of these deliberate acts of evil, natural evil occurs. A form of natural evil would be......

Words: 832 - Pages: 4

Hamartiology: the Problem of Evil (Theodicy)

...Pcantan2 Turabian Writing Style THEO 202-B17 Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) You would have to ask yourself, why does a God who is all-loving and all-powerful, allow evil to exist in a world that was divinely created by Him? Because when you ponder the problem of evil, it is the most obvious and serious challenge to belief (Faith) in God and His existence, which is why religious scholars have dedicated so much effort towards resolving it. Elwell states, “The phrase ‘the problem of evil’ is a label for a series of such problems involving good and evil.”[1] But the problem with evil is if an omnipotent and omniscient God exists, then there should be no reason God would tolerate such pain and suffering. Evil acts, thoughts, and words will always separate us from God, which was established from the beginning with Adam and Eve. Isaiah 59:2 says “your iniquities have made a separation between you and your God, and your sins have hidden His face from you so that He does not hear.”[2] This is the only thing that separates us from God and causes Him to turn His face away from men. However, evil would have never existed had Adam and Eve not sinned and opened the door for it to enter the world upon all men (Romans 5:12).[3] The resolution then is to be united back to God, who is the source of eternal life, through His Son Jesus, (1 Jn.5:20; Jn.17:2-3). The biggest problem today, among believers and non-believers, is that they are blinded to what evil is and what...

Words: 1110 - Pages: 5

The Problem of Evil

...Name: Leah Drumheller_____________ Writing Style Used: ____________MLA________________ Course and Section Number: ______THEO 202 B22 LUO________ Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) An age-old question that has been and is being asked from various religions, cultures, and socioeconomic backgrounds is how can a loving and good God allow evil to come into the world? It is a problem that has come up several times by mostly atheists and non-believers, but few Christians are asking it as well. This paper is going to address the problem of evil, why bad things happen to good people, and state the theodicies that explain and answer the problem. The problem of evil has been brought up and used as an argument by non-believers for a long time. How can a loving and good God allow evil to come into the world? They claim that these two Christian beliefs are self-contradictory and that nothing can make sense of it. They state that Christians believe that God is all-powerful, that God is good and loves His people, and that an all-powerful God is capable of doing anything and everything. They say that This question has been used to unjustifiably contradict the Christian worldview in its attempt to prove that it is flawed. They are biased and desire to convince other people and themselves that their worldview is correct by discrediting the Christian religion and/or the Bible. (Feinberg, 414). The deductive reasoning that atheists have are......

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Theodicy/ the Problem of Evil: a Result of God’s Divine Plan or an Act of Man’s Free Will

...LIBERTY THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY THEODICY/ THE PROBLEM OF EVIL: A RESULT OF GOD’S DIVINE PLAN OR AN ACT OF MAN’S FREE WILL A PAPER SUBMITTED TO DR. TODD S. BUCK IN PARTIAL FULFILLLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CLASS SYSTEMATIC THEOLOGY I THEO 525 BY JOHN S. POPE JR LYNCHBURG, VIRGINIA May 11, 2013 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of Theodicy……………………………………………………………………….2 Divine Providence..............…………………………………………………………………..3 God’s Sovereignty/Man’s Free Will………………………………………………………...5 Conclusion…...………………......……………………………………………………….....10 Bibliography………………………………………………………………………………...12 The human race is afflicted by kidnappings, poverty, murder and oppression. The question men have struggled with is how can a good God allow such evil to continue? On a moral level, an even better question would be is the evil man experiences at the hands of other men, a result of God’s divine plan or the effect of man’s free will? Answering these questions is important because uncovering the reason for ongoing evil has challenged some to the point, they have denied their faith and joined a corps of atheists who promote the idea that the presence of suffering, pain and evil are the best testament to a non-existent God. When arguing against the existence of God, one might be presented with attempts to use His divine attributes of omnipotence (all powerful), omniscience (all knowing) and omnibenevolence (all good) against Him....

Words: 3692 - Pages: 15

(I) in What Ways May Suffering Be Seen as a Problem for a Religious Believer? Give an Account of Two Solutions to This Problem.

...existence of god, as they may believe that if evil exists, then God can not, as the God of classical theism would not allow evil to happen. A solution to the problem of evil is the Augustinian theodicy. Augustine begins by saying that the universe was created perfectly and all good, with no evil in it. He also argues that there is no such thing as evil, and evil is just a privation of good, the same way one might argue that darkness is a deprivation of light. He goes on to say that evil was bought into the world by humans and angels when they disobeyed God and therefore sinned (the fall). He argues that the sin done in the fall was then seminally passed down through adam to everyone on earth now, so we all have this original sin. He goes on to say that therefore, it must mean that we deserve to experience evil, as God is a just God and must punish us for our sins. Also, he believes that God showed his love and kindness when he sent his son, Jesus, down to earth to die, so that those who believed in him could have eternal life in heaven and those who didn’t, and committed sin would face eternal torment in hell. This solves the problem as it argues that it was humanities fault rather than Gods fault for the existence of evil. Another solution to the problem of evil is the irenaean theodicy. Irenaeas does not argue that the world was created perfectly but instead argues that we are all created in the image of god and over our lives we would develop into the likeness of God and......

Words: 1205 - Pages: 5

Rastafarianism

...devastating hurricane. Politically, colonialism gripped the country and the future of the masses looked hopeless. Any doctrine which that promised a better hope and a better day was ripe for hearing” (Barret 84). Weber analyzed conditions such as these as a theodicy of suffering. “One can explain suffering and injustice by refrying to individual sin committed in former life, to the guilt of ancestors . . . to the wickedness of all people. As compensatory promised one can refer to hopes of the individual for a better life in the future of this world or to the for the successors, or to a better life in the hereafter” (Weber 275). In other words, those who are disadvantaged in a situation (the poor, hopeless, black Jamaicans) will be rewarded. “The poor people have a decided advantage in the Rastas’ view, since they are forced to look into themselves and confront the basic reality of human existence - and only there can God be found” (Owens 173) Their negative situation will be turned into a positive one (transvaluation) because they are the truly righteous, or so they believed. Rastafarianism was more than a religion to the people of Jamaica, it was a hope. It was their escape from the the rational everyday world. This theodicy of suffering, in which the underprivileged and underrepresented Jamaicans believed, was compensation for the deplorable state in which they found themselves. The Rastafarian way of living and their everyday activities began as a deviant social......

Words: 3550 - Pages: 15

What Is Meant by the Problem of Suffering for Religious Believers? Examine Two Solutions to This Problem

...worshipping if that God isn't omnibenevolent. A solution to the problem of suffering is the Augustian theodicy, proposed by St. Augustine (AD 354-430). His theodicy, an attempt to justify the existence of a loving God in the face of evil, argues that God created the world and it was perfect, without the existence of evil and suffering. He defines evil as the absence of goodness so evil is not an entity in itself meaning that God could not have created it. The existence of evil originates from free will which creates an absence of good was The Fall explains. The Fall being the myth of the first human disobedience of God's command, the eating of the fruit from the free of knowledge of good and bad in the Garden of Eden by Eve and Adam. This caused change in the relationship between God and humans. Augustine said that humans are worthy of punishment of evil and suffering because we are, 'seminally present in the loins of Adam.' Meaning that humans deserve punishment for the original sin. This means God didn't introduce evil into the world and we shouldn't blame God for the existence of it. Making Augustine's theodicy a solution to the Problem of Suffering because believers can place the blame upon themselves. A second solution is the Irenaean Theodicy, a contrast to Augustine's soul-deciding theodicy, Irenaeus proposed soul-making (AS 130-202). This meaning that this theodicy is more concerened with the development of humanity. Irenaeus accepted that God was partly to......

Words: 1096 - Pages: 5

Theodicy

...Theodicy A theodicy is simply a justification of God’s ways. Theists are generally compelled to express a theodicy in response to the unfortunate, painful, evil events and circumstances found in our world. A theodicy is necessary only if we believe in a God who is inherently good, thus requiring an explanation of the apparent discontinuity between a good God and evil in the world. In order to express my own theodicy, I will discuss the forms of evil in the world and their various manifestations as well as whether or not creation as a whole is a “good” expression of the creator God. I will also discuss how eschatology affects our view of evil and God’s part in allowing or interfering with evil. Finally, I will discuss which theodicy I find most complete and why, as well as some of the strengths and weaknesses of my own theodicy. Evil in the World Expressing a theodicy requires a basic understanding of evil which can be referred to in light of that expression. The problem of evil has been dealt with in three separate classifications during our class time and reading; moral, natural and gratuitous evil. Moral evil is an evil event or circumstance caused by a human. Examples of moral evil would be murder, lying, stealing and greed. Moral evil results as the consequence of the decisions made by human beings exerting their free will. War, oppression and slavery are prime examples of moral evil perpetrated by human beings. Natural evil includes the pain and suffering......

Words: 1951 - Pages: 8

Hamartiology

...Hamartiology: The Problem of Evil (Theodicy) – Your neighbor Sam greets you outside as you return home from church one Sunday. After the usual chitchat, he confides in you that he has been troubled with the news, recent reports of natural catastrophes, wars, disease, and so on. He asks if you could help him make sense of the presence of evil in the world - if indeed God exists.

 Keeping this scenario in mind, answer the following questions in your essay: • What is the problem of evil? • Define moral evil and natural evil, and illustrate them with examples. • Seek to explain why there is sin among mankind (the philosophical problem of moral evil) and why bad things happen in nature (the philosophical problem of natural evil). Consider the various theodicies presented in the reading, and address the merits and faults of each one. • Briefly explain why a theodicy must be internally consistent, and defend the internal consistency of your explanation of evil’s existence. • Consider how personal experience of evil may affect one’s relationship with God (the religious problem of evil). Do you believe someone can dispute a certain belief about God without actually attacking God Himself? Sam, evil in the world is a problem that exists. Even someone, like yourself, who is unsure of the existence of God recognizes a problem with a blemish in what seems to be an otherwise perfect world. I think you could agree that if evil was removed from the world, it would be near......

Words: 1038 - Pages: 5