Deontological Paper

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Cole85
Words 699
Pages 3
MGMT 368 Business Ethics
Week 4 Deontological Second Paper
April 15, 2012
Direct-to-consumer drug advertising - Deontological Point ofView
For many years, consumers relied and depended on the expertise and knowledge of physicians to make decisions on their pharmaceutical needs. Before 1985, prescription drugs could not be advertised directly to consumers. The U.S Food and Drug Administration passed a rule that allowed Direct-to-consumer drug advertising in 1985. This ruling was passed on the condition that warning information was provided about side effects and other dangers. “Directto- consumer advertising is the promotion of prescription drugs through newspaper, magazine, television, and internet marketing. Drug companies also product a range of other material, including brochures and videos, that are available in doctors office or designed to be given to patients by medical professions or via patient groups.” ("Source Watch") Currently the United
States and New Zealand are the only two developed nations that allow direct-to-consumer advertising of pharmaceutical drugs. Other nations feel that direct-to-consumer advertisements are often just sales pitches that pressure doctors to make unnecessary prescriptions.
("Prescription drug ads") I favor direct-to-consumer advertising/marketing of pharmaceutical drugs and believe that it is ethical. In this paper I will be using the deontological ethics of
Immanueal Kant' s Theory to support my reasoning. Immanuel Kant developed the most influential deontology. Kant argues that to act in the morally right way, people must act from duty. I favor the direct-to-consumer advertising. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the government's duty is to provide channels for pharmaceutical companies to directly communicate with its consumers. The purpose of this communication is to inform consumers about a…...

Similar Documents

The Movie “Blood Work” Deontological and Utilitarian Analysis

...When we analyze the movie, Blood Work, simultaneously while taking into regard both Deontological and Utilitarian points of view, we notice a complex behavior in all characters involved, especially Terry McCaleb. The main character, Terry McCaleb, has the most complex behavior of all as he has the tendency to jump the fine border between Deontology and Utilitarianism multiple times back and forth. Throughout the entire movie, McCaleb faces multiple Deontological dilemmas but the biggest and most important of all of them is his decision to self-sacrifice for the good of others. He makes a selfless decision which could have very well cost him his life. We need to take under consideration that this time around, his life is a gift from a victim who was murdered and this time is possibly his last chance at life. When analyzing McCaleb, we must consider his living medical condition, potential terminal risks that come with receiving a heart transplant, and his personal struggle to fight rejection of his peers. Even though aware of all disadvantages involved in proceeding with his decision to pursue the killer, McCaleb acts out of duty towards other people disregarding all and any consequences. Kant believed that the real character of people is seen at times when their decisions are hanging in a fine line between different choices. For Kant, a person’s temperament and nature would prevail on the road taken. “It is just then that the worth of this character comes out, which is......

Words: 2174 - Pages: 9

Paper

... |PDT | | | |Write a 350- to 700-word essay comparing the similarities and differences between virtue | | | | |theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. Include the following in your essay: | | | | | | | | | |A description of the differences in how each theory addresses ethics and morality | | | | |A personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts | | | | |as they relate to one of the three theories | | | | | | | | | |Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines. | | | |Week Two: Individual Responsibility in the Community | |...

Words: 1967 - Pages: 8

Comparison Between Deontological and Utilitarianism Ethics

...Comparison between deontological and utilitarian ethics Deontological ethics Deontology is a normative theory attributed to Immanuel Kant, which focuses on the concept of the duty. It is concerned on fulfilling what is believed to be a moral duty without considering its impact to other people. It takes the stand that the duty defines the right actions regardless of the consequences. The hold of deontological ethics is that doing right is what conform the moral laws. According to Kant, right actions are not done by following inclinations, impulses or obeying the principle of greatest happiness but are done simply and purely from the sense of duty. Kessler says that some ethical truths and norms are appropriate to everyone in the society, and therefore, people should always act morally irrespective of the outcome for their morals. In deontology ethics, actions are done for the sake of duty. The intrinsic moral feature determines the rightness or wrongness of the act taken by individuals. The duty should always be done by taking the right. For example, duty of a teacher is to benefit a student, and he would like to know the impact of different teaching techniques to the student so as to help him determine the technique which can and cannot benefit the students. Therefore, the rightness of the action is dictated by the rule of the act and not by the outcomes of the act. Rather, outcomes helps to determine the best action to up keep the established duty. Kant says that in...

Words: 1539 - Pages: 7

Compare the Similarities and Differences Between Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics.

...Ethics Essay Sandra Faye ETH/316 March 6, 2012 Irma Flores-Brothers Ethics Essay Ethics is the science of right and wrong in human action.” (Boyle, 2009, Chapter 1, Living in a World of Values). The overall purpose of this paper is to compare the similarities and differences between the three major approaches in normative ethics; virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will do this by analyzing these ethical theories and by describing them along with presenting the facts on how each theory relates to ethics and morality. It will also include a personal experience to explain the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to one of the three theories. We have all been faced with the circumstances that have pushed our moral boundaries. Virtue ethics refers more specifically to one character embodying for determining or evaluating ethical behavior. In other words virtue ethics emphasizes one moral character.  According to Boylan (2009), virtue ethics is also sometimes called agent-based or character ethics. It takes the viewpoint that in living your life you should try to cultivate excellence in all that you do and all that others do. (Chapter 11, It’s All About Your Character: Virtue Ethics). For example, finding a wallet with money in it, and returning it to the rightful owner is an act of virtue. One of my proudest moments growing up as a 15years old......

Words: 665 - Pages: 3

Deontological Versus Teleological Ethical Systems

...Deontological Versus Teleological Ethical Systems ADJ/235 July 8, 2011 Deontological Versus Teleological Ethical Systems Ethical Systems Ethical systems are ordered principles or guidelines to make moral decisions. They are the source of moral beliefs. Ethical systems help define what is right or good. Ethical systems are morals that are shared by a group of people, but not all people always agree to what is right or good. There are seven major ethical systems. These major systems are ethical formalism, utilitarianism, religion, natural law, ethics of virtue, ethics of care, and egoism. Each of these major ethical systems is either classified as deontological, teleological, or virtue. Deontological Ethical Systems A deontological ethical system is based on the idea that we have a duty to do certain things and not doing certain things. The word deontological comes from “deonto” meaning “duty” in Greek (Wittjen). With the deontological ethical system, one would consider the basic duties and rights of individuals or groups and make a decision based on your moral beliefs. Ethical formalism is deontological and is a type of theory which defines moral judgments in terms of their logical form rather than their content. Ethical formalism is considered as an absolutist system. If something is wrong, it is wrong all the time. Just as if something if right, it is right all the time. For example, the death sentence is wrong because death to someone and anyone is wrong......

Words: 882 - Pages: 4

Ethics Paper

...ethics paper Ethics Essay Curtis Menezes ETH/316 April 11, 2013 Kevin Burke Ethics Essay When discussing similarities and differences of virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics, one will notice that the differences outweigh the similarities. Utilitarianism states that an action is in the right but only if it stays true to the principle of utility. Deontological ethics is a little different as it's basis of right and wrong has to do with nothing else that an individual's duty. The virtue theory is based on the two types of virtue which are intellectual and moral(Fahey, 2010). Utilitarianism was founded in the Victorian era by Jeremy Bentham. Bentham came up with this idea because he wanted to have a way for people to have the ability to be as happy as possible, and in doing a morally correct action it would make that person feel good which would give a sense of happiness. Deontological ethics can be seen in a quite different light. this theory is based on the duty of an individual. it could be used during a war because in any other time it is wrong to kill, but during a war if one kills because it is the duty of a soldier then that makes it ok and in most cases morally correct (Fahey, 2010). The virtue theory is more modern and ethical. Like utilitarianism it was invented to bring happiness, but it has more freedoms along with it. the virtue theory lets the individual become the one in charge and decide from learning what is morally......

Words: 487 - Pages: 2

Ethics Essay: Virtue, Utilitarianism Theories, and Deontological Ethics

...In the following paragraphs the three ethical theories virtue, utilitarianism theories, and deontological ethics will described relating factors to ethics and morality. Definitions for each will be given followed by how they relate in comparison to ethics and morals. Conclude by explaining the relationship between virtue, values, and moral concepts as they relate to ethics. Comparing morals and ethical theories helps one to understand a person’s guidance method, which helps or aides a person through their decision making process. Each theory will emphasize the different points including predicting the outcome or end results. To compare the similarities and differences between virtue, utilitarianism theories, and deontological ethics, you will see the breakdown what is meant by virtue and utilitarianism concepts and how they are defined. Stemming from my research, we understand ethics is the study of the person’s action and how that person determines right and wrong. And morals are our ability to determine right from wrong influenced by our upbringing in a religious environment. According to Merriam Webster Dictionary (n.d.), virtues are “conformity to a standard of right” and “a commendable quality or trait”. When I think about virtues, I imagine a person who does what is right no matter what the situation. This person must possess a quality trait that makes him or her believe that there is a higher power they have to eventually have to answer to in the end. “Virtue...

Words: 923 - Pages: 4

The Ford Pinto Case from a Utilitarian and Deontological Perspective

...wouldn’t it be? But in terms of benefits and costs to Ford, the teenager is worth much more as someone who is affected by their actions. But this basis of inclusion does not allow you to price their continued existence. Ford neglected to consider the costs of lying, cheating and endangering their customers. You cannot use money to predict the consequences of your actions. The ends rarely justify the means, and while utilitarianism is certainly a good basis for ethical business practices, it cannot be seen in terms of dollars if it is to be successful. Money is only one consequence, using it exclusively diminishes the importance of all the other consequences. Under utilitarian ethics, Ford acted in a morally corrupt manner. From a Deontological perspective Deontology, in contrast with utilitarianism, tries to judge the morality of an action by it’s adherence to sound ethical rules, and it’s considerations of others’ rights. It considers not only the outcome, but also the intention of an act. According to Immanuel Kant, the only way to exhibit good behaviour is through good intentions, so an act is morally right if you meant to do the right thing by doing it, both in terms of inner motivation and in the consequences to the rights of others. He said we should all act according to a series of categorical imperatives, and that is the road to moral rightness. Kant gave three formulations of a categorical imperative. The first formulation states that you should act as......

Words: 885 - Pages: 4

Deontological vs. Teleological Ethic

...Deontological vs. Teleological Ethics Law and Ethics for Health Professions HPR 106 Leslie Podeszwa Suppose you are working as a respiratory therapist and have been paged to the ICU (intensive care unit) to provide a breathing treatment for a patient. The patient is a 31 year old male who has been in a serious car accident and is suffering from a concussion, severe head and neck lacerations and several broken bones. He has just come out of an intensive surgical procedure and just now alert enough to receive your treatment. The nurse told you that his daughter and wife were killed in the accident and the decision has been made not to tell him about their deaths for ‘his own good’. The staff has agreed to tell him when he is more physically and mentally stable. As you walk into the patient’s room, he immediately asks you about his wife and daughter. 1. What do you say? a) From a Deontological standpoint, what do you say? Why? A Deontological theory states that at least some actions are right and wrong, therefore we have an obligation to perform them or refrain from performing them, without consideration of the consequences. This theory follows the belief that our actions should be universal which means that everyone would act the same way with the same set of circumstances. It would be difficult to decide what to say, because I would want to be told the truth but would also want the best end result. The patient will find out about their deaths whether I tell......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics Paper

...Virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics are all examples of morals and ethics and have their similarities and differences. In this paper the similarities and differences will be explored a personal experience shared. Virtue theory is how a person acts and does not take into consideration particular acts, rules, or consequences, the only consideration is if the person is acting morally or unmorally. Virtue theory is composed of three main ideas eudemonism, agent-based theories, and the ethics of care. Eudemonism is based in reasoning, agent-based theories are based in common sense and intuition, and ethics of care is solely based on justice and it should be noted as a primarily feminist idea. Utilitarianism is maximizing pleasure over pain not for only oneself but for the greatest number of people possible. Utilitarianism is often seen in a religious sense and can be attributed to the Christian teaching of Jesus Christ or the Buddhist teaching of the Buddha. Utilitarianism can also be seen as a hedonist as written about by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, since the act does not cause a negative effect for others. Utilitarianism’s main lesson is maximizing pleasure over pain, but can be interpreted in more than one way. Deontological ethics is basically making the correct moral choices; this can be seen through a religious spectrum as following the rules of the (Christian) church and doing the Lord God’s will. The person committing an act......

Words: 576 - Pages: 3

Deontological Ethical Theory

...Deontological Ethical Theory Deontological derives the word 'Deon' from Greek and the word means duty or obligation. Deontological belongs to the normative position of ethics as it judges an action's morality basing the judgment on action to these rules. A deontology is in one sense basically a theory of our duties just like the rest of the other theories of ethics. Scholars have frequently contrasted this theory to Consequentialism. Immanuel Kant based Kantianism on deontology as he argued that in order to act morally, individuals should act from duty. Individual's should not pull the plug when their lives are endangered as deontology will judge the morality of such decisions based on the rule's actions. The application of deontology is better brought out by the absolute deontologists who support the belief that action are either right or wrong; pulling the plug is therefore either right or wrong, no in-betweens. The best way to view this act is to focus neither on the intentions nor consequences of the act but rather the act itself. This is what absolute deontologists uphold. The first step of the analysis is to determine what pulling the plug entails. When one ends the life of another it is considered as murder. If they end the life of many it is manslaughter. If an individual ends their lives then they are considered to have committed suicide. If they try to commit suicide and they fail they are said to have attempted suicide and are in a retribution state tried in a...

Words: 741 - Pages: 3

The Ethics of Direct to Consumer Marketing of Prescreption Drugs from a Deontological Perspective

...Jennifer Rocha Instructor M. Whitfield Business Ethics -MGMT 368D Paper 2 - Deontological February 7, 2015 THE ETHICS OF DIRECT TO CONSUMER MARKETING OF PRESCREPTION DRUGS FROM A DEONTOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to explore the ethics of direct to consumer marketing of prescription drugs from a deontological perspective shaped by Kant’s Categorical Imperative testing method. In researching this issue one thing that I found as interesting fact is that of the some 200 countries in the world, only the United Sates and New Zealand allow direct to consumer pharmaceutical advertising (DTCPA) (DeGeorge 320) . Clearly worldwide there is an ethical issue with allowing consumers to become aware of medications based on advertising on TV or in magazines, newspapers and billboards. I too, feel that there are ethical issues, using Kant’s Categorical Imperative we will evaluate the morality of such advertising and its consequences. I read an article by ABC contributor Larry Woodard, it grabbed my attention in the first few sentences “I sat in my doctor's office a couple of weeks ago waiting for my annual physical. I soon grew tired of all the science and car magazines and started looking around. As in most doctors' offices, most things had pharmaceutical company logos on them: The clock, the Kleenex dispenser, the calendar. But what gave birth to this column was the doctor himself. He walked out of one of the examination rooms, clipboard in hand, talking......

Words: 2004 - Pages: 9

Arguments for and Against Euthanasia in Terms of Teleological and Deontological Theories

...main general categories in which we can place the ethical theories: teleological and deontological. From the first category we enumerate the Aristotelian perspective or the one developed by J. St. Mill, while the Kantian perspective is exemplary for deontological ethics. According to the teleological perspective, a form of human behavior is described as moral or non-moral according to the goals explicitly set. The mere achievement of these goals is a necessary and sufficient condition to qualify as moral people’s actions or deeds without taking into account the “intermediate stages” of the actions performed to achieve those goals. Deontology, as a general horizon of articulating the ethical theories, believes on the contrary that in every moment of our existence, every action or deed that we accomplish can be described as moral or non-moral according to the ethical principles underlying our behavior. The very important consequences arising from the two general theoretical horizons concern two different perspectives on “human nature”, or what we call the essence of the human being. Starting from this horizon we will have the consequentialist and deontological dimensions related to euthanasia. The bioethical dimension in which we will discuss the issue of euthanasia involves both dimensions or horizons. The arguments against euthanasia seem to rely rather on the Kantian deontological horizon, while euthanasia pros seem to rely on the consequentialist horizon. This......

Words: 9099 - Pages: 37

Virtue Theory, Utilitarianism, and Deontological Ethics

...Virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics In this composition, I will equate the relationships and variances between virtue theory, utilitarianism, and deontological ethics. I will examine the disparities in how each principle tackles principles and virtues, and finally illuminate an individual experience concerning virtue, values, and moral concepts, and how they relate to one of the three theories. Individually ethics has elements that are the similar and different. Virtue Theory is a method to ethics that highlights a person's character as the main component of moral thinking, rather than guidelines about the actions themselves or their costs. Utilitarianism is the examination we should do is justly generating the highest conceivable value for the highest achievable amount of people. Deontological ethics is in observance of the Scriptures, accepted ethical rule and perceptions from common logic. The similarities between the three are that they define moral and immoral characteristics about an individual, and with the determination of their activities, it also governs the quality of the person that is virtue ethics. Utilitarianism is comparable that finds the decency in an individual. A subject it avoids is finding the immoral in an individual. Per deontological ethics, the outcome of the act is moral not immoral. It holds actions that are ethically necessary for penalties made by individual activities. The differences amongst the three ethics......

Words: 624 - Pages: 3

Deontological and Teleological Approaches to Ethical Decision Making’

...‘Deontological and teleological approaches to ethical decision making’ The term deontological is an approach to Ethics that focuses on the rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of the consequences of those or to the character and habits of the person, whilst on the other hand, teleological Teleology is a reason or explanation for something in function of its end, purpose, or goal. For example, a teleological explanation is where is does not focus on the action but it only focuses on the outcome or consequences. Ethical decision making helps people make difficult choices when faced with an ethical dilemma, a situation in which there is no clear right or wrong answer, Refers to the process of evaluating and choosing among alternatives in a manner consistent with ethical principles. In making ethical decisions, it is necessary to perceive and eliminate unethical options and select the best ethical. If an ethical approach if deontological, it means the morality of an action is intrinsic, which means that the act is completely wrong or completely right. Also the right or wrong of the act cannot change, it stays the same. For example - murder is wrong because it is wrong, it will always be wrong. Therefore this is a Deontological approach towards murder. On the other hand, if an ethical approach is Teleological, it means that it only focuses on the outcome that is caused by the action, also it is the result of an action that......

Words: 609 - Pages: 3